Ben Bussey, at Yahoo! Movies, wrote a piece that confirms exactly what I wrote a good while back and it's interesting to see confirmation. You doubted your Uncle terry!
https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/post/128321997761/did-disney-deem-avengers-age-of-ultron-a-failure
I do, however, think that it is stretching things to believe that Disney are going to take artistic creativity more seriously.
Why? Look at the comics and the movie universe. The movies are good, if nothing to do with the characters and comics that Disney bought. But there is really only one thing Disney wants and likes and that is money. The $ versus creativity. Creativity loses every time.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Can a feature film really earn gross profits of just over $1.4 billion worldwide during its theatrical run - and still be considered a disappointment by its studio?
According to a report at Bleeding Cool, this has been the case for ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ at Marvel’s parent studio Disney.
BC’s sources tell them that “although the film made a lot of money and got okay reviews, it didn’t make enough money. Or get as good reviews as the first. People, basically, didn’t go back for seconds.”
It would seem Disney were hoping to see the superhero sequel break the record set by its 2012 predecessor, which was until recently the third biggest box office hit ever - until that record was broken earlier this year, not by ‘Age of Ultron’ but by Universal’s ‘Jurassic World.’
As absurd as it may seem to look at box office takings of over a billion dollars as a failure, we might note last year’s ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′ managed over $700 million worldwide, and was still deemed a series-killing flop.
However, it is important to note that the Hollywood studios tend to be particularly concerned with how well their films perform domestically, and ‘Age of Ultron’ grossed just shy of $478 million - less than a third of its overall takings - in the USA, whilst the original made just over $623 million.
‘Age of Ultron’ was also a more expensive film to make, with a production budget of $250 million - $30 million more than its predecessor. And that’s not taking into account marketing and distribution costs.
https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/post/128321997761/did-disney-deem-avengers-age-of-ultron-a-failure
I do, however, think that it is stretching things to believe that Disney are going to take artistic creativity more seriously.
Why? Look at the comics and the movie universe. The movies are good, if nothing to do with the characters and comics that Disney bought. But there is really only one thing Disney wants and likes and that is money. The $ versus creativity. Creativity loses every time.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Can a feature film really earn gross profits of just over $1.4 billion worldwide during its theatrical run - and still be considered a disappointment by its studio?
According to a report at Bleeding Cool, this has been the case for ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ at Marvel’s parent studio Disney.
BC’s sources tell them that “although the film made a lot of money and got okay reviews, it didn’t make enough money. Or get as good reviews as the first. People, basically, didn’t go back for seconds.”
It would seem Disney were hoping to see the superhero sequel break the record set by its 2012 predecessor, which was until recently the third biggest box office hit ever - until that record was broken earlier this year, not by ‘Age of Ultron’ but by Universal’s ‘Jurassic World.’
As absurd as it may seem to look at box office takings of over a billion dollars as a failure, we might note last year’s ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′ managed over $700 million worldwide, and was still deemed a series-killing flop.
However, it is important to note that the Hollywood studios tend to be particularly concerned with how well their films perform domestically, and ‘Age of Ultron’ grossed just shy of $478 million - less than a third of its overall takings - in the USA, whilst the original made just over $623 million.
‘Age of Ultron’ was also a more expensive film to make, with a production budget of $250 million - $30 million more than its predecessor. And that’s not taking into account marketing and distribution costs.
Of course. Is there even a question ? Having looked at the last few blogs etc. it's obvious that the end is at hand. Byrne was sacrificed for as much. Youth is the idea bing marketd by the assholes for both creators and fans - and the great old guys who are the makers of the very legacy that is being exploited, and it is a legacy which is being swept carelessly away - because sadly, profit profit profit is the only god of these assholes who seem to be making all teh decisons. See the end of the big money, see the end of the Disney/Marvel rainbow. Movies can be made without comic books ( of course ) but comics are just the current, limited, sacrificial cow being pulled into place to be slaughtered. Look back at other genres that were equally abused - it's not that hard to find. This is strip-mining type management. Take the best assests and sell them first - they can always be re-sold. The rest. Just scraps to be milked as much as possible. The sadest thing in reality is that I really don't care. I'm interested in independent work. the heart and the soul of it. The Paul Bown's and the Terry Hooper's of it all. The heart and the soul that comics can be, and should be,it's about is the unique individual mind of the creator and his/her value of life and what they can produce from within themselves. A real work of art......and Marvel/DC with all their resourses absolutely fail to address this, The humanity. The humanity of us all. I need to sleep.
ReplyDelete